I'm a Hardcore Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Represents the Optimal Solution for American Healthcare
Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.
Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.
The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly
According to recent research, the average family pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.
Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.
When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?
When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.
How National Health Insurance Could Function
A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.
Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.
Implementation for America
For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.
Benefits for Entrepreneurs
Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).
It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.
Addressing Concerns
Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.
Time for Honest Assessment
We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.